Hi @Jorn van Dijk. You asked for feedback re: the marketplace re-do. As a journalist/designer, this is my two cents: 1. Much better! 2. There is still room for improvement in the tagging results.

Please re-evaluate how the templates in the Publishing tag arrived there in the first place.: I see lots of portfolio templates (which are not publishing templates) and other templates that look like anything but a professional or an informal media.

Since publishing is one of the most important purposes a CMS can serve, @Framer needs to make sure that anything in that category is exactly what a publisher (prospective or active ) needs, because they will evaluate the eligibility of Framer as a publishing tool according to these criteria, I would say:

1. The tool itself (that rocks already).

2. Available templates that are fit for publishing.

3. The UI frameworks and design systems management options.

4. The assets ecosystem, including connectivity with existing tech and media-targeted solutions.

5. Media-friendly pricing.

(Willing to review publishing templates and to point out the ones that would actually entice an actual newspaper or magazine publisher, and to work in a selection of publishing-related mktplace assets).

Hi @Jorn van Dijk. You asked for feedback re: the marketplace re-do. As a journalist/designer, this is my two cents: 1. Much better! 2. There is still room for improvement in the tagging results.

Please re-evaluate how the templates in the Publishing tag arrived there in the first place.: I see lots of portfolio templates (which are not publishing templates) and other templates that look like anything but a professional or an informal media.

Since publishing is one of the most important purposes a CMS can serve, @Framer needs to make sure that anything in that category is exactly what a publisher (prospective or active ) needs, because they will evaluate the eligibility of Framer as a publishing tool according to these criteria, I would say:

1. The tool itself (that rocks already).

2. Available templates that are fit for publishing.

3. The UI frameworks and design systems management options.

4. The assets ecosystem, including connectivity with existing tech and media-targeted solutions.

5. Media-friendly pricing.

(Willing to review publishing templates and to point out the ones that would actually entice an actual newspaper or magazine publisher, and to work in a selection of publishing-related mktplace assets).